Full Transcript

Thank you. [transcription gap] Pledge of Allegiance. Thank you. Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Okay. Thank you. We have three public hearings tonight. Matt, I'm going to call you up to help us out with Gouda LLC, please. You got it. Thank you. For the record, Matt Chard, Senior Planner. For the town of Riverhead, I will start by reading the public hearing notice into the record. Please take notice that a public hearing will be held before the planning board of the town of Riverhead at the Riverhead Town Hall for West 2nd Street, Riverhead, New York, on Thursday, the 5th day of June 2025 at 6 o'clock p.m. to consider the site plan application entitled Gouda LLC, which seeks approval to construct a 1,359-square-foot office building with on-site parking and other related site improvements within a 13,617-square-foot vacant parcel with a 13,617-square-foot vacant parcel located within the business center zoning use district situated at 365 Harrison Avenue, Riverhead, more particularly described as Suffolk County Tax Map Number 600-102-3-4.1. If the board sees, the site plan is up on our screen here. It's pretty simple to understand. One way in, one way out off of Harrison Avenue. This application did require relief from the Zoning Board of Appeals to have a 5-foot side yard setback and a 25-foot buffer where 35 feet is required along 58th and 58th in the front yard, which was granted by the ZBA. At last week's ARB meeting, their elevations were approved. Other than that, I have the applicant here. If the board has any questions or members of the public. Thank you, Matt. Anybody from the public would like to speak?

Good evening, Mr. Densetsky and members of the board. I'm Adam Grossman. I'm the attorney for the applicant this evening. And my client is here as well. And in any case, you can see from the site plan this is an unusual shaped lot. There are some challenges, but my client has tried as best he could to be as conscientious as possible in terms of where the primary structure is located and where parking is located so as to minimize any impact on adjacent property owners. I do also just want to mention that there was a letter submitted by one of the adjacent property owners, Richard Israel, who owns the Taco Bell next door. So he had a few comments. But basically, I'm here with my client to say that if you have any concerns about any aspect of the site plan that we can address, we're glad to do so. So we welcome questions. Thank you, Counselor. Okay. Was there any problem with any of the questions that he posed to you? Or are you satisfied? I think in terms of what he, the issues that he raised, the fencing, that was addressed by the Zoning Board of Appeals. So that was actually a condition of the variance. And I think he was, he's concerned. I'm looking at his letter. The letter is dated May 30th. He's asking, I think it's important that the applicant remove all the trees and existing vegetation within the five feet along the westerly line. I don't know. If we have a problem with that. Is that, that's acceptable. He's also, he also mentioned, and he also mentioned the existing trees along the, his parking lot should be being, my client's parking lot should be removed to make clearance for his curb and light poles, which I think we're fine with as well. So as to the dumpster, I'm not even sure if my client's going to need a dumpster. I know it's on the site plan. But he's not even sure if it's something that's going to be necessary. I think it's going to be necessary for the use of the building. However, if we want to, you know, move it to a different location, basically what he's suggesting that is the neighbor suggests that it would match the building if it were of a different material. The dumpster, he's referring to the dumpster enclosure made of cement block, which is great. There is some text that suggests that it would match the building, which is a different material. Please have the applicant define the materials and exact location of the dumpster. I believe that's indicated on the survey where it's currently located. But like I said, I'm not sure if it's necessarily going to be needed at all. So basically. David M. Keep the garbage? You're not going to generate any garbage? David M. Well, it's just I don't know if we're going to need a dumpster for the garbage. Is that correct? David M. Yeah. And we can also screen whatever there is in terms of garbage removal. Whatever ends up being there. Maybe something much smaller than a dumpster would be screened with a chain link fence. And I'm just trying to see if there was anything else. The plan should also show the county dedication line that exists for all developed properties along Old Country Road. The Taco Bell parcel, which is the adjacent property owner's parcel, has a 15-foot offer of dedication to the county. And if the planning board wants us to do that, we certainly can do that. And that's it. But we're really not. I think that the adjacent property owner brings up reasonable issues that we're absolutely willing to address. Thank you. David M. Okay. Matt, the 15-foot, is that by law? Matt Lowrie Yeah. So typically the county always asks for that. I'm not sure that DPAW actually referenced it in their comments. It might have happened already because this property used to be owned by the county. David M. Oh, okay. Matt Lowrie But if it's needed, DPAW will call it out. David M. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Matt Lowrie Thank you. Matt Lowrie Any other speakers? Adam, did you want to add something else? Adam L. No. I just wanted to mention if any members of the Board have any concerns that you'd like the applicant to address, we're happy to listen to whatever concerns you have and address them. Matt Lowrie Okay. Thank you very much. Adam L. I'll move we close the public hearing. Second? Matt Lowrie Moved and seconded. Mr. Zelnicki. Zelnicki What about Zoom? Sorry. Matt Lowrie I'm sorry? Zelnicki Zoom? Adam L. Anybody on Zoom? Matt Lowrie Oh, I'm sorry. Zelnicki We do have people on Zoom. I don't know if anyone wants to speak. Mr. Zelnicki Okay. If you're watching from home and you want to speak, raise your hand so Heather can see you on the screen. Mr. Zelnicki Hello. [transcription gap] Okay.

Zoom them out. All right. The motion's been moved and seconded. Mr. Zelnicki? Yes. Mr. Hogan? Yes. Mr. DeNiro? Aye. Mr. Baer? Yes. And I vote aye. The motion's carried. Very good. Thank you all. We appreciate it. Okay. Moving on to number two. Sandy Pond Links, LLC Clubhouse, Trade Shops, and Managers Residence. Greg's not here, so Matt's going to help us out again. Got it. Okay. Please take notice that a public hearing will be held before the Planning Board of the Town of Riverhead at the Riverhead Town Hall, 4 West 2nd Street, Riverhead, New York, on Thursday, the 5th day of June, 2025, at 6 o'clock p.m., to consider the site plan application of Sandy Pond Links, LLC, seeking to construct a plus or minus 3,100 square foot clubhouse with covered porches as accessory to an existing nine-hole executive golf course and an 18-hole mini golf course, construct a plus or minus 1,040 square foot property manager residence, and three 7,200 square foot property managers, along with parking areas, landscaping, lighting, and related site improvements on a parcel of land located at 1521 Roanoke Avenue, Riverhead, New York, within the Residence B40, RB40 Zoning Use District, and more particularly described as Suffolk County Tax Map number 600-82-1-12.1. And I do have the applicant's attorney, Kimberly Judd, here. If the board has any questions about this, the site plan is up on the screen. Thank you, Matt. Yep. Thank you. Thank you. Anybody like to speak on this application?

Anybody on Zoom, Heather? No one with their hand raised.

Okay. Kim, do you have the plans? I'm just wondering if you and Brian ever will go to consider the other entrance, commercial entrance on the south side of the property. Yes. Good evening. Kimberly Judd, 737 Roanoke Avenue, Riverhead, for the applicant. We did, and we were waiting to see if there was going to be a plan for the site. So, I'm just wondering if there was going to be anybody at the public hearing who was unhappy with that. But, my client is willing to do that second entrance if that's the board's feeling on it. Okay. Because when I met with Brian, the berm will stay. And there are trees planted there already. Maybe just add a couple more trees so the neighbors would not see that. No. Is it Brian Starkey? Okay. Did you want to speak, Brian? Hi. Good evening. Brian Stark. I'm an applicant. I spoke to the neighbors and I spoke to Eddie about we'd like to do one entrance. Because I think it's better for us. And I think it's better for the roadway to have one entrance. The whole storage facility will be secure. I know there was discussion about if that use was going to be. An attractive nuisance for the kids who were playing golf. It's our opinion that we like the site plan we have with one entrance. And we'll screen it. The second entrance might have been a problem with some of the neighbors. So that's why I think one is better. So that's my belief. That we should stick with the one. And if we just have to screen. And do other things. But to be clear. That whole storage facility will be gated. Lit. Secure. So I'd rather stick with one entrance on Roanoke Avenue. But you're still going to have a second entrance to the house. Yeah. And that will be just for one house up against the south side. That will only. That won't access the storage facility. With the storage facility over there. I believe. I can't see it from here. But on the drawing. They had tractor trailers. Is that what you're anticipating? Having. A. Tractor trailer. Well. The prior use. That we're retaining. Is basically trade shops. So what was in there before. Was definitely not tractor trailers. It would be small tradesmen. So I don't know any. Small tradesmen that have tractor trailers. No. I thought on one of the drawings that it had. Like a tractor trailer drawn in. I didn't know if that's what you were anticipating having in there or not. Well. I think. I think it's a little bit drawn in. Just so we know we have turning radiuses and things like that. If occasionally you have a guy in there. But the intent is not to have any kind of tractor trailer traffic on a regular basis. Trade shops are typically smaller. I think the intent there was if you got a delivery from FedEx and they used a small trailer. You know. I mean. You can't stop that. It's just a quick delivery. Right. You know. Nothing that's going to be in and out constantly. Yeah. I mean. You want to have freedom of movement there. You know. With the back. Because all the loading stuff will be in the back. Okay. Got you. Any other questions? No. I'm good. All right. Moved and seconded. Mr. Zelnicki. Thank you. Mr. Hogan. Yes. Mr. Nenarro. Aye. Mr. Baer. Yes. And I vote aye. The motion carries. Okay. Moving on to number three. 840 Old Country Road. With Matt. I'm like a handsome man alive. I'm a handsome man alive. [transcription gap] Okay. Last but not least.

for use auto sales and will include the reconfiguration of on-site parking access as well as a change of use to an adult use retail cannabis dispensary with related site improvements within a 1.806 acre improved parcel located within the business center BC zoning use district situate at 840 old country road within the town of overhead more particularly identified as Suffolk County tax prep number 600-82-3-9.1 does the application need any zoning relief it does not and I do have the applicants representatives here and the owner if you have any questions site plans on the screen the board can see they're reconfiguring the front so we're getting our 35 foot buffer along old country road and they're moving the curb cut that's on Ostrander Osborne I always get them mixed up Ostrander further to the north how far are they from the school from the Riverhead high school more than the 1,000 foot buffer report so I'll head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head [transcription gap] head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head over 55 community. There are four over 55 communities. We've had problems with break-ins to cars already. Bringing something like this where you have nothing but elderly people and you also have the Timothy Hill Ranch, which is for children of not best circumstances. You know, you're providing this. And you're right next to the hospital. How ridiculous. I'm a nurse. I'm a retired nurse, but I think it's the worst thing in the world. Nobody starts out using cocaine or crack. They start off with marijuana. So, Riverhead was written up last year as one of the best places to live on the New York Times. Now we're going to have to have an addendum. It's one of the best places to get your drugs. Nobody in the communities are happy about this. And I'm the only one who's annoyed enough to come here. But, you know, we could get a whole petition going because it's not fair. It's not to us that we moved here. We want to be in the world. We want to be in the world. We want to be in a safe community. And you're inviting problems. There's already two places to get your marijuana. I hate the smell. So, there's that huge one on Old Country Road. And then there's a medical. How many do we need? Does Riverhead now have to be known as the place for drugs? Come on. So, thank you for listening to me. But I'm not happy. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. And I think it's going to cause a lot of issues with, you know, there's going to be problems. You're going to have traffic because you're going to have Old Country Road. You're going to turn Ostrander, which is a one lane each way. You have gas stations. You have, you know, another business there. You're going to have, there's going to be problems. It's on the corner. The other one on Old Country Road is on a straightaway. People want to turn in. This is on a corner. There's two gas stations. It's going to be a mess. You're going to have traffic. You're going to have more accidents. And we have an elderly population that drive down these roads. Do we really need to expose them? them to a situation that could be more hazardous to their health. Thank you. Thank you very much. Any other speakers? Do we have anybody on Zoom? We have people on Zoom, but no one who wants to speak at this point. Okay. Gentlemen, any questions? I say we close the public hearing. Matt, is there a how far from residence is there a footage from a residential? This property does have location approval from the town. Just so this board knows, when a marijuana application comes into the town, they have to submit what's called a notice of municipality through the town's clerk's office. It gets routed to the planning department to make sure it conforms to our code. That process has already happened. In terms of distance from residence, it's normally a 1,000 foot buffer requirement, but there's an exception in the code for commercial corridors. So there's commercial corridor 1, 2, 3, and 4. Commercial corridor 1 is on 25A in Waiting River, starting at the town line, going to where it joins 25. Corridor 2 is continuing there. It's 25 until you get about to 58. Corridor 3 is Route 58, where this property is located. 4 is on 105, east of 105 on 25, I believe, until Tuttle's. And 5 is from Tuttle's until you reach the town line. So if you have frontage on and direct vehicular access to a corridor, you do not have to comply with the 1,000 foot buffer from a resident. Okay. A little long-winded, but I think I got your question. Second question. If this is approved across the street or any place within 1,000 feet, you can't put a child care or anything like that? You can't now? An applicant can't put? I don't know. I'd want to rely maybe on the town attorney's office for that, being that this use is here. There's a separation distance requirement. I don't know if someone else could choose to develop a child care facility and be less than 1,000 feet. It's hard to say. But our distance requirements are to establish one of these businesses from what you're buffering from, if that makes sense. Oh, okay. There's a... People may regulate the location of the child care facility. Yeah. And that would come into play when they wanted to come. Yeah. So that's one of those things. Yeah. So if Dawn didn't get picked up, the state has its own regulations, which also dictate distances from those sort of uses. So they might preempt. Okay. Anybody else? Thank you. I think you moved it, George? Yeah, I moved to close the public hearing. Moved and seconded. Let's have a vote, please. Mr. Zelnicki? Yes. Mr. Hogan? Yes. Mr. DeNiro? Aye. Mr. Baer? Yes. And I vote aye. Motion's carried. Okay. Let's go right into discussion items. We have one item. Osborne Residence, Chapter 219 at 2705 Roanoke Avenue. With help? Heather.

Good evening, everyone.

And we have Mr. Cuddy here for the applicant. For the record, Heather Trojanowski, planner for the town of Riverhead.

How you doing, Mr. Cuddy? Thank you. This is Mr. Madigan, who's the architect. Welcome. What's your name? Sorry. Sean Madigan. Thank you.

Okay. So this is a Chapter 219 application seeking to construct a one-story studio over a full basement and also a two-car detached garage all seaward of the Coastal Ocean Hazard Line. In addition, the applicant is proposing site alterations, including a new site. This is a residential area. This area is going to be used to build a new sanitary system, grading, drainage. They are going to re-vegetate some disturbed areas. The subject parcel, more particularly identified, a Suffolk County Tax-It number 600-15-1-1.1 is a 1.13-acre parcel located at 2705 Roanoke Avenue in Riverhead within the Residence 240 Zoning Use District. I believe that the board is probably familiar with the area. And I know you live up there. It's a very peculiar property. But it's a very unique area. and that you know the southern portion of the property slopes down from very high elevation levels out slightly in the area of the driveway that's where this new construction is being proposed slopes down again and then the existing dwelling actually sits right on the beach I think at about between elevation six and seven it's pre-existing benefits from a letter pre-existing use was built I believe in about 1911 so it's very old in terms of compliance with code this will need relief from the zoning board of appeals as they are the coastal erosion hazard Board of Review because the new development is not specifically permitted under chapter 2 19 to 14 subsection B but I wanted to bring it to the Planning Board just to you know introduce it to you because if they are successful at the zoning board they will be back to this board for chapter 2 19 approval I did refer it to Vinnie our consulting engineer with the Rainer group he sent a memo data June of this year and he said that he would like to see the zoning board completed by June 2nd which I circulated to the board and also on the applicant's attorney he is really just looking for a soil boring to be performed and then he had a question about the driveway encroachment which in viewing the property historical files it looks like there was a boundary line agreement you know I would be happy to have the town attorney's office look over that just to make sure that any sort of encroachments between the subject parcel and the parcel to the east are you know all taken care of and there aren't going to be any issues I also started the referral process with the New York State DEC because it's unclear whether the wooden bulkheading lost the line of the house and then it looks like there's a retaining wall on the western portion of the property for in existence prior to the title wetlands act of 1977 and I you know corresponded with mr. Cuddy about submitting a joint application to determine whether they would need a permit from the DEC or if DEC would issue a letter of no jurisdiction so it's a little bit of a they haven't gone to DEC that no no no I reached out to DEC just to see you know what they what would be required I sent them the plans in the application and they came back with requesting that joint application form be filled out which I'm assuming mr. Cuddy and or the applicant or the design professional would take care of I would just ask that I'd be you know either copied on any correspondence just to be kept in the loop other than that I visited the site again it's it's a difficult site to develop and I understand why they're proposing the structures in the spot that they are but the Seaha line is everything including the new development is c-word of the Seaha line and it's almost as if they're at one point where two points of inflection but you know years of erosion and looking at historical surveys it appears that the top line of the block is about where the driveway sits um and there there is existing vegetation there are areas of noticeable washout um particularly along the northern end of the driveway and then also the southern end of the driveway where the property uh steeply slopes you can see in the pictures in my staff report there's a lot of exposed tree roots and then just other observations i made there's a bamboo and what appears to be mugwort on the property i'm sure dec would be very amenable to having those removed and replaced with native species you know if they're successful with the zoning board and they move on to construction it's expected that all of this would be removed and the applicant's design professional is proposing some native species and plantings in those disturbed areas how do you remove bamboo i mean it's extremely difficult i know from a couple of my neighbors had some and they actually wound up building retaining wall stuff yeah there is an existing retaining wall at the end of the driveway um i mean i don't know if it's like yeah it's a small area um i mean whatever they could do to start removing it i defer the dec as far as management of invasive species is concerned mugwort is equally as difficult to remove um just because of the root structure um i was talking with jeff seaman and it's a it's an extreme nuisance on coastal properties residential properties it's everywhere you know the longer it's allowed to spread the worse it's going to get it's going to basically choke out native species that contribute you know positively to the biodiversity and the ecosystem and also the root mat that stabilizes the bluffs so did they did they do a test board to see if the septic will work there at that elevation um i think that's what vinnie was asking um they didn't show it on the proposed plans but it's something that we'll want to see i don't think we have a boring test but i'll i can confirm

yeah so that's something that i would definitely recommend we also have an engineer who couldn't come tonight but yeah yes we're working on that okay yeah just verify that it's good and mr cuddy is this going to be a second uh residence on the property not so ever no i i will explain a minute when she gets oh okay what we think we're doing okay okay yeah i mean i'm i mean i'm not going to read through the entire property but i'm not going to read through the entire property but i'm not going to head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head head went in a little deep as far as like the subdivision and the CNRs. Obviously it was contemplated at that time by Planning Commission Planning Board when the subdivision was approved, you know, that this was an environmentally sensitive area and they had notes about like no grading, no clearing and cutting and vegetation within 50 feet of the top edge of the bluff. In addition, the approved subdivision map actually has like a setback line on it, a hundred feet from the mean high watermark, which is just south of where the driveway area is. But again, like where their building envelope was shown on the subdivision map is where the property is most steeply sloped. So arguably that would probably be more challenging to try and build something. If someone were to want to retreat from, you know, the beach where the house currently sits, that's usually the goal is to retreat away from points of erosion or beach areas. You know, it would be difficult to develop south of the driveway. Nevertheless, it's not permitted by code. So the decision lies solely with the zoning board. Okay. Okay. Just to go over what we think we're doing. I don't know if you have her report in front of you. Yes. But I think page five has a picture that's worthwhile to look at. Okay. So this is the site. Because it shows the actual parking area. This is a completely level flat area. And this is basically the top of the buff. In other words, it's been done years and years ago. My client bought the property 30 years ago. When he bought it, it was like this. And he said to me, he had been there earlier, many years earlier, and it's so clear, so clear. So the area that we're going to work in is going to be essentially a level area so that we're not under, so that's clear. on a slope we're basically on a flat level plane here we're going to put a garage that's 545 square feet we're going to put a writer's studio and i can go into that a little bit that's going to be essentially 670 feet it's going to have a basement and this thematic and can explain the reason for the basement but it's not an accessory apartment whatsoever it has a half bath because it has a bathroom with a sink in it but doesn't have a shower the person who's a writer lives with mr osborne in the house just below this she's her name is susan har she's a recognized writer she's having a play in london in the kingshead theater in july and august so she's that natural writer it's not just somebody that's come along she's looked to have this place in for quite a while and as you know there's a section in the code i don't know where it it heads off to but it's a definition called artist dwelling so i think the town considers this type of thing to be something appropriate it's not something that unusual um the the entire site as i say has been used over and over again as a garage without i'm sorry a car place without a garage um mr osborne's getting older he'd like to have some place he could put his car get it out of the rain she would like to have this small studio and as i say the studio itself is 600 square feet it's not a not a big building um we're aware of the covenants that we just heard about but i think that those covenants really don't apply to this site for two reasons one the site itself has been there for a long long time and it's been graded so we're not doing anything that's going to disturb it any more than it's been disturbed over this period of time and it's really pre-existing it pre-exists the 1983 covenant that was put on so we we believe it's an appropriate use and and really they're just accessory uses these aren't this is not a primary building which we probably could do but it would be in the middle of the slope as she just pointed out so we think this is an appropriate use it's not something that's going to i don't think destroy any part of the area and we're going to have drainage we're going to have a septic system that will show that we can put in i think that overall that all he's asking for is something that most people would expect to have with their house this happens to be in the coastal roving area but it happens to be an area that's completely level which is really unique so we hope the board would consider it mr madigan is here and maybe can explain a little bit to you why we have a basement in the studio yeah so we're i mean because of the topography um right where this flat area stops we're cantilevering maybe a few feet um four four and a half feet um underneath that um we have basically we're just using the retaining the retaining walls that we would have to make or the foundation walls that we would have to make to build this um adding the basement i think is just it's using space that was storage created and it's an unfinished storage with the basement that's the only thing would be used for it um it would meet the definition of like a seller you know under the building code um it would be more than 50 submerged or whatever so um did you have any questions well this will this studio um be open all year round are you heat and air conditioning everything it's intended to be yes conditioned that the the main uh studio area would be conditioned the garage not and the basement below not so someone could spend a night there hypothetically yes yeah the possibility of that is small because they now live in the dwelling right down below down below yeah they don't seem to have too many people i don't know if you've been there or not but i think it's a good idea to have a lot of people in the building and i think it's a good idea to have a lot of people in the building to the site but no but i yeah i get to the dwelling it's a big deal yeah yeah you have to go down steps then you have to go down more steps and more steps and then you get there so the possibility of having too many people over to this site is pretty small um there's there's a lot of steps there so the reason for that bathroom is you're writing all all day or whatever you don't have to walk the you know it's like a five minute walk down there it's pretty long distance but we don't have a problem covenanting that it's only for this purpose whatsoever and that no one i understand the thought that possibly could do that but yeah we're trying to avoid that happening by whatever you would like us to do because i think most of the uh like the the artist villas that you're referring to i think that was pretty much for downtown riverhead they wanted walkable community with artists lofts off the top years ago i i have one so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so meet the criteria for relief from Chapter 219. So there's not going to be a kitchen. The bathroom is just going to be there. No cooking facilities or anything. And the basement is probably just going to be like a mechanical room for the heat and air conditioning and places like that. Yeah, so outside of the soil boring that we're going to need per Vinny's memo, is there any other concerns that the board had? I just have a question. The owner, you said, is Mr. Osborne? Yes. Is that of Osborne Avenue? Any relation? Not that I know of. We'd be on Hitman Auto Body. I say there are any spouses with a name. Sometimes Osborne and Snowy. Yeah, and Hitman Auto Body. Yeah. Competitive. Other than that, the applicant and his attorney, they've been provided with a denial letter so they can proceed to the zoning board. We're in the process. We're doing that. Okay. Good luck. Okay. Thank you. Oh, just. You're going to make applications to the health department as well. Oh, yeah. Absolutely. I had something similar. The reason I waited, because of the height, they said there was no jurisdiction. This is in South Pole with the riverhead. So I'll find out if they take the same position. Okay. Thank you. All righty. That's it on discussion items. Public comments. On resolutions. Anybody can speak on resolutions.

I don't see any hands up. So, gentlemen, if you want to run the resolutions. I'll move resolution 2025-049, TJOC Real Estate Holdings, to retain LKMA as a professional consultant to the planning board to review traffic impact study in connection with the comprehensive developed plan. On. For. A 15.8 acre parcel of land located on the north side of Middle Country Road in Calvertine. So moved. Second. Moved and second. Mr. Zelnicki. Yes. Mr. Hogan. Yes. Mr. DeNiro. Mr. Baer. Yes. And I vote yes to motion carries. I'll move resolution number 5-0, which deems draft environmental impact statement for the site plan and subdivision of TOC Holdings. Excuse me. To be inadequate. To be inadequate. And says. Before the planning commission. Second. Moved and second. Mr. Zelnicki. Yes. Mr. Hogan. Yes. Mr. DeNiro. Aye. Mr. Baer. Yes. And I vote yes to motion carries. I'll move resolution number 20-25051, Calvertine Industrial Subdivision. Issues a positive declaration requiring the preparation of a supplemental environmental impact statement. So moved. Second. Moved and second. Mr. Zelnicki. Yes. Mr. Hogan. Yes. Mr. DeNiro. Aye. Mr. Becker. Yes. And I vote aye. The motion carries. Resolution 2025-052, National Grid Facility Upgrades. Resolution granting administrator site plan approval for a site plan application seeking to perform improvements on existing national grid facility. Second. Moved and second. Mr. Zelnicki. Yes. Mr. Hogan. Yes. Mr. DeNiro. Aye. Mr. Baer. Yes. And I vote aye. The motion carries. I'll move resolution. Hold on one second, George. Okay. No, I'm sorry. Go ahead, sir. 2025-052, National Grid Facility Upgrades. Okay. No, I'm sorry. Go ahead, sir. 2025-052, National Grid Facility Upgrades. Susan McCarthy, minor subdivision, granting an extension of the minor subdivision approval. So moved. Second. Moved and second. Mr. Zelnicki. Yes. Mr. Hogan. Yes. Mr. DeNiro. Aye. Mr. Baer. Yes. And I vote aye. The motion carries. I'll move. We have something on jets. I'll move. [transcription gap] granting extension of minor subdivision approval for a minor subdivision application entitled manna lane uh so moved second moved to second mr zelnicki yes mr hogan yes mr de niro hi mr bear yes and i brought out a motion carries resolution 20 25 056 malice property minor subdivision resolution granting two 90-day extensions of a minor subdivision approval for a minor subdivision application second moved in second mr zelnicki yes mr hogan yes mr de niro hi mr bear yes and i brought on motion carries um table uh we're gonna make a motion to table i understand from the department of law that the applicant is not ready so we're gonna table it the second uh somebody move it i'll move it move move to second mr zelnicki yes mr hogan yes mr de niro hi mr bear yes and i vote on the motion carries to table we'll see them in the future okay okay i'll move resolution number 20 25 058 1080 to 1120 old country road facade improvement resolution granting administrative approval for the site plan application entitled 1080 uh dash 1120 old country road facade improvements so moved second uh discussion um matt do we know if uh if the lighting is coming into the compliance so everyone should have gotten a copy of the amended plans which uh had a lighting schedule and everything is 3000 kelvin height compliant downward facing um yeah so yeah lighting's coming in and they're painting both buildings to match and they're adding landscaping to the existing awesome and they did put trash receptacles all the way around the facility so so that's all the fine fare fine fare of all that yeah lighting is now okay yeah it's all gonna fly and then yeah that's all right and then we're gonna move on to the next item which is the building construction i think when they first came in they were only showing that they were painting like half the building they're gonna do everything awesome great good okay we moved in seconded the motion uh mr zelnicki yes mr hogan yes mr de niro hi mr bear yes and i vote aye the motion carries okay at this time we're going to have public comments on all any matters okay [transcription gap] okay okay okay okay okay so so so River Road so that application is before the town board for a special permit okay night is the planning board and does the planning board have any rules that come before the planning board except for site plan okay only if the special permits grant correct correct okay so should I wait and meet with the with the town board for this then yeah it was so it was on town board just to begin the secret process on this past Tuesday okay

okay all right thank you then very correct any other comments okay we have the minutes of the meeting of May 1st in seconded mr. Zanicki yes mr. Hogan yes mr. narrow mr. bear yes I go right emotion carries I guess we have no secret actions tonight Matt okay good other business staff you guys staying busy all right good no correspondence our next meeting date because of June 19th we will not be here in June the next meeting will be July 3rd 2025 at 6 p.m. if somebody wants to make a motion I vote yes. Mr. Zanicki yes Mr. Hogan yes Mr. Nero yes Mr. Nero yes Mr. Hogan yes Mr. Zanicki no motion no move second moved in second all in favor aye motion carries have a great weekend everybody Subtitles by the Amara.org community

Thank you.